Gold University of Minnesota M. Skip to main content.University of Minnesota.
 
Minnesota Technical Assistance Program
Intern Program
Materials Exchange
Resources
Wastes
Industries
 

Dry Cleaning

Energy Conservation

Fiber Reinforced Plastics

Food Processing

Health Care

Iron Mining

Laboratories

Machining & Metal Fabrication

Metal Finishing

Metalcasting

Painting & Wood
Finishing


Paper Mills

POTWs

Printing

Vehicle Maintenance

Water Conservation

 

 

 

MnTAP logo   612.624.1300
  800.247.0015
 
  Home > Intern Program
intern summary printable PDF
 

General Mills Saves Over $27,400 by Reducing Water and Sewer Costs

Decreasing SAC by Evaluating Water Uses throughout Plant

Company General Mills Bakery plant
Chanhassen, Minnesota
Results Reduced water and sewer costs by $5,400 a year and a one-time SAC by $22,000 through repairs and modifying process equipment. Cost $700. Water softening system changes expected to save another $3,000 annually plus $12,000 in SAC savings. Cost $6,000.

The General Mills, Inc. Chanhassen plant makes food products like cookies, cakes, rolls and muffins sold to cafeterias and restaurants. Products are either baked and sold ready-to-eat or are ready-to-bake at the point of use. All products leave the Chanhassen plant frozen. In 2000, the plant's total average water use was 100,000 gallons a day.

Water Use (estimated percent) 
Product ingredient 10 % 
Domestic purposes 15     
Cooling towers or boilers 22     
Production-floor cleaning tasks 53     

Incentives for Change
Water purchases and sewer charges totaled about $140,000 in 2000. Of that, $12,000 was from water use above the previous service availability charge (SAC) baseline. As part of its sewer discharge permit renewal, the plant was assessed a one-time SAC of $135,000 for an increase in sewer use of 123 SAC units* over its existing SAC baseline. The plant was given one year to reduce water use in order to decrease the SAC assessment.

The plant already had made significant efforts to reduce water and sewer costs by scraping equipment and sweeping floors before washing the surfaces to keep dough and food solids out of the drains. With the assistance of a consultant, the plant:

  • installed a VRTX water conditioning unit on one cooling tower, nearly eliminating blowdown for purging dissolved solids and treatment chemicals;
  • optimized the operation of three pan and bucket washers to reduce water use;
  • reduced effluent strength charges; and
  • was credited with "deducts" for water not sewered.

The consultant estimated these efforts reduced water use by 41 percent. At the same time, increased concern about the effect of food allergens on sensitive individuals, and resulting U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) rules, led to more frequent line and equipment cleaning.

Average flow is used to set a SAC baseline, but peak flow is used when recalculating SAC after reductions. Because of the bakery's day-to-day variability in water use, its peak flows made further reduction necessary to decrease the SAC assessment. General Mills requested a MnTAP intern to help reduce water use, hoping to lower or eliminate the SAC charge.

Sink Moderators
The production floor has 32 sinks, making hand washing and utensil cleaning convenient for over 700 production workers. Each sink's faucet had about a two gallon-per-minute (gpm) flow when open. Aerators, common conservation devices, were not used because they inject air, and possibly bacterial contamination, upstream. The intern identified moderators as an option. Moderators are flow restrictors that are screwed on faucet openings and make the stream of water appear larger, like aerators, but without aerating.

Initially, 0.5 gpm moderators were installed on all 32 production sinks and all 20 rest room sinks, reducing water use by an estimated 4,200 gallons per day (gpd). After several months, experience showed that higher flows were needed for some cleaning tasks; all but one of the production sinks were refitted with moderators ranging from 1.0 to 1.5 gpm. Even with higher flow moderators, water was still reduced by at least 2,100 gpd, with one-time SAC savings of at least $9,200 and annual savings of $2,100.

Freezer Belt Washer
In the freezers, belt washers were used for one or two line cleanings during the week and a more extensive cleanup on the weekend. When operating, the belt washers consumed 40 gpm from the plant's 180°F water circuit. Belt washers were the highest single-use of this water. Nearby flows of hot water were adversely affected when the belt washers were run. One of the plant's three belt washers was studied and modified.

Initially flows were decreased to 17 gpm with good cleaning results. Over the next two months cleaning effectiveness declined; flow was increased to 25 gpm. Cleaning effectiveness again declined over time. Investigation led staff to believe that the diaphragm pump was at fault. After replacing it with a piston pump providing eight gpm flow, cleaning was consistent and effective. Savings were roughly $800 a year in water and sewer costs and $3,000 in one-time SAC savings. Energy savings were not estimated.

Repairs
Pan Washer. While trying to resolve a discrepancy between the manufacturer’s specified water use and the actual volume measured on one of two pan washers in the plant, the intern discovered a bent, leaking rinse header. Replacing the header reduced water use by 1.5 gpm (2,100 gpd). This saved $8,800 in one-time SAC fees and $2,200 in water and sewer fees. Six months later cleaning quality in the other pan washer declined. Based on the intern’s previous discovery, maintenance quickly traced the problem to a damaged rinse header and fixed it.

Faucet Leak. Repairing a dripping faucet reduced water use by 100 gpd, saving $400 in SAC fees and $150 in annual water and sewer charges.

Boiler Purge Cooling. In an attempt to comply with a sewer discharge rule that prohibits discharge of water above 150°F, the small, continuous purge of the surface water in the boiler was mixed with fresh, cold water. When measured, the temperature of the purge was 138°F before cold water was added—already below the discharge limit. Even if the temperature at the floor drain exceeded the limit, the purge volume was relatively miniscule and its heat would dissipate in the overall plant discharge before entering the city sewer lines. Eliminating this cold water mixing saved $400 in SAC fees and $150 in annual water and sewer charges.

Softened Water
Split streaming. Softening facility water is generally all or nothing—city water is used directly with a hardness that reflects the water source, or all water is softened. But with split streaming a portion of the water supply is softened and then mixed with hard city water in constant proportion so the water has a consistent, known hardness to meet facility needs.

In order to decrease variability in product quality, General Mills set a corporate water hardness specification at 100 to 300 parts per million (ppm) (5.8-17.5 grains hardness). Split streaming to achieve a target hardness of 150 ppm will decrease the frequency of softener regeneration by nearly 40 percent, reducing water demand by about 2,500 gpd, and saving $3,000 a year in water and sewer cost, and possibly $12,000 in SAC. Installation is expected to cost about $6,000.

The facility's maintenance staff expect split streaming to decrease plumbing maintenance costs. Controlling the hardness of the water will create a balance between pipe corrosion from water that is too soft and scale buildup from water that is too hard. The Chanhassen plant plans to install split streaming controls when it is completely shut down, allowing for the switch over.

Softener regenerating. Regenerating the softener resin consumed about five percent of the plant's process and domestic water. The intern identified four steps in the regenerating process that could be adjusted depending on facility requirements. At the General Mills plant, the final fast rinse intended to pack to the resin bed used 15 percent of regeneration water and appeared to be a candidate for reduction. Split streaming cut the volume of softened water, reducing the need to consider this option. Companies that use large volumes of softened water, 100,000 gpd or larger, may want to investigate ways to optimize the softener's regeneration cycle.

Application to Other Companies
Crucial to the success of this MnTAP intern project was identifying, quantifying and understanding the individual uses of water in the plant and critically evaluating the volumes used and procedures to see if they matched the production, quality and safety requirements.

Additional Reduction: VRTX Cooling Tower Water Conditioners
The Chanhassen General Mills plant installed a VRTX water conditioner on a trial basis in July 2000 on a cooling tower with 1,270 tons of cooling capacity, as an alternative to chemical water treatment. A second VRTX unit was installed on a 1,550 ton cooling tower in August 2001.

The installed cost of both units was about $130,000. No chemical additions have been made to the two cooling towers since their VRTX units were installed. Blowndown to control the buildup of dissolved solids decreased from about 30 percent of the makeup water volume to about three percent.
De-mister plates have been freer of scale and microbial fouling, resulting in lower electrical and maintenance costs. Total annual savings were estimated at more than $108,000 a year plus a one time SAC savings of about $35,000. Based on the experience at the Chanhassen plant, 19 additional VRTX units were installed at General Mills production plants around the country as of September 2002.

More Information
MnTAP has a variety of technical assistance services available to help Minnesota businesses implement industry-tailored solutions that maximize resource efficiency, prevent pollution and reduce costs. Our information resources are available online. Or, call MnTAP at 612.624.1300 or 800.247.0015 from greater Minnesota for personal assistance or more information about MnTAP’s Intern Program.

* SAC unit = 274 gallons of sewered water per day.

(1/03)

 



General Information
2008 Summer Projects
Businesses Apply
Students Apply
Past Projects

 

 
 
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.