Gold University of Minnesota M. Skip to main content.University of Minnesota.
 
Minnesota Technical Assistance Program
Intern Program
Materials Exchange
Resources
Wastes
Industries
 

Dry Cleaning

Energy Conservation

Fiber Reinforced Plastics

Food Processing

Health Care

Iron Mining

Laboratories

Machining & Metal Fabrication

Metal Finishing

Metalcasting

Painting & Wood
Finishing


Paper Mills

POTWs

Printing

Vehicle Maintenance

Water Conservation

 

 

 

MnTAP logo   612.624.1300
  800.247.0015
 
  Home > Resources > Pollution Prevention Planning

Sample Painting Process Flow Chart

Paint Application
Paint application is a complete step, but there are a number of factors that can affect waste generation, paint consumption, and product quality.

This step generally has large losses associated. In this case:

  • 1,130 gpy of evaporation from parts as well as from paint overspray
  • 350 gpy of solids from overspray, this is equivalent to 1,170 gpy of purchased paint
  • 150 lb/yr of filter/paint arrester waste

Prevention Planning
Paint application has no substeps, but there are a number of factors that can affect waste generation, paint consumption and product quality.

Sources of Waste, Inefficiency and Cost
Evaporation losses of 1,095 gpy come from paint drying on parts. Materials accounting might show:

  1. Transfer efficiency is 49 percent. This is quite good for a liquid painting operation. Lower transfer efficiencies increase the incentives for making improvements.
  2. Paint lost to overspray is the equivalent of 1,095 gpy (value $11,000-$50,000/ year) of purchased paint.
  3. Evaporation losses amount to 1,027 gpy from overspray. This is 50 percent of reportable VOC and HAP emissions
  4. Much of the overspray is caught on filters resulting in shorter filter life and greater filter use.
  5. An estimated five percent of parts painted need to be reworked. Cost of rework can include the value of scrap product, the cost of reworking the product ranging from spot sanding and touchup to stripping and refinishing the part. A likely minimum cost is the value of the paint used in the first pass, or 120 gpy with a value of $1,200 to $6,000 a year.

Next steps would be to determine if transfer efficiency improvements or rework reduction should be evaluated, and then to identify the factors that make transfer efficiency lower or rework higher than it could be.

Plant operations for this example:
paint preparation | part preparation | paint application | paint curing | paint cleanup | assembly, inspection & shipping

 

MnTAP logo

 

MnTAP Publications
- Source Newsletter
- Permission to Reproduce
P2 Planning
————————————
Business Awards
Calendar
Financial Assistance
Links
Regulatory Resources



 

 
 
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.